3M™ Coban™ 2 Layer Compression System

  • Options available
  • | Select product options for IDs.

Heals venous leg ulcer¹

Delivers therapeutic compression²

The compression layer is designed to be applied at full stretch, reducing application variability

View more details
Frequently viewed resources

Details

Highlights
  • Heals venous leg ulcer¹
  • Delivers therapeutic compression²
  • The compression layer is designed to be applied at full stretch, reducing application variability
  • Interlocking materials reduce potential for slippage³, to encourage longer wear
  • The thin, lightweight, breathable sleeve allows patients to wear their own footwear⁴, so they can return to their regular daily activities
  • Not made with natural rubber latex, not irritating, not sensitising
  • One size fits all
  • Can be safely left in place for up to 7 days on the leg³

The 3M™ Coban™ 2 Compression System is comfortable to wear and simple to apply. The system comprises of two thin layers to provide the stiffness required to sustain working pressures/low resting pressures to reduce oedema without the bulk. Recommended for patients with an ABPI ≥ 0.8.

The system is specifically developed to overcome some of the challenges that clinicians encounter with compression therapy. This compression system offers benefits to both clinicians and patients. Each system is supplied as a kit that includes two rolls: a Comfort Layer roll and a Compression Layer roll

Suggested applications
  • For management of venous leg ulcers, oedema, lymphoedema and other clinical conditions where compression is appropriate
  • Coban 2 Compression System may be used for patients with an ABPI greater than or equal to 0.8
  • Coban 2 Lite Compression System may be used for patients with an ABPI greater than or equal to 0.5

Specifications

Resources

Connect with us. We’re here to help.

Need help finding the right product for your project? Contact us if you need product, technical or application advice or want to collaborate with a 3M technical specialist

Send Us a Message

Thank you for your interest in 3M. In order to help us manage and respond to your query effectively, we politely ask you to provide some key information, including your contact details. The information you provide will be used to respond to your request through email or telephone by a 3M representative or one of our authorised business partners with whom we might share your personal information consistent with the 3M privacy policy

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 3M takes your privacy seriously. 3M and its authorized third parties will use the information you provided in accordance with our Privacy Policy to send you communications which may include promotions, product information and service offers. Please be aware that this information may be stored on a server located in the U.S. If you do not consent to this use of your personal information, please do not use this system.

  • Send Message

Thank you for your contacting 3M

We have received your message and are now looking into your enquiry
One of our representatives will get in touch with you by phone or email

An error occurred.


Similar products

Comfort Layer Length (Imperial) 3.8 yd, 1.3 yd, 3 yd
Compression Layer Width 5 cm, 10 cm, 15 cm
Comfort Layer Width (Imperial) 6 in, 2 in, 4 in
Comfort Layer Width (Metric) 15 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm
Compression Layer Length (Imperial) 3 yd, 5 yd, 4.9 yd, 3.8 yd, 6.3 yd
Compression Layer Length 2.7 m, 4.5 m, 3.5 m, 5.8 m
13. 3M Data on File 2014; UK Health Economics Model9. Franks P, Moffatt CJ, Murray S et al (2012) Evaluation of the performance of a new compression system in patients with lymphoedema. International Wound Journal (in press)10. Collier M, Schuren J (2007) Ease of use and reproducibility of 5 compression systems. Journal of Wound Care 2007, Supplement 8-109. Franks P, Moffatt CJ, Murray S et al (2012) Evaluation of the performance of a new compression system in patients with lymphoedema. International Wound Journal (in press)9. Franks P, Moffatt CJ, Murray S et al (2012) Evaluation of the performance of a new compression system in patients with lymphoedema. International Wound Journal (in press) 12. Moffatt CJ, Franks PJ, Hardy D et al (2012) A preliminary randomized controlled study to determine application frequency of a new lymphoedema bandaging system. Brit J Derm 166 (3) 624-6324,⁴ 3M Data on file. ⁵ P. Franks et al: Evaluation of the performance of a new compression system in patients with lymphoedema, International Wound Journal, 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00958.x (early view online publication),¹ Mosti G, Crespi A, Mattaliano V: Comparison Between a New, Two-component Compression System With Zinc Paste Bandages for Leg Ulcer Healing: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial Monitoring Subbandage Pressures WOUNDS 2011;23(5):126–134. ²H. Partsch: Indications for compression therapy in venous and lymphatic disease Consensus based on experimental data and scientific evidence Int Angiol 2008; 27:193-219. ³Moffatt C et al. A randomised controlled 8-week crossover clinical evaluation of the 3M™ Coban™ 2 Layer Compression System versus Profore™ to evaluate the product performance in patients with venous leg ulcers International Wound Journal 2008, 5 (2) , pp. 267-279. ⁴ 3M Data on file.,8. Moffatt C, Edwards L, Collier M et al (2008) A randomized controlled 8 week crossover clinical evaluation on the 3M™ Coban 2 Layer Compression System versus Profore™ to evaluate the product performance in patients with venous leg ulcers. International Wound Journal 5 (2) 267-2798. Moffatt C, Edwards L, Collier M et al (2008) A randomized controlled 8 week crossover clinical evaluation on the 3M™ Coban 2 Layer Compression System versus Profore™ to evaluate the product performance in patients with venous leg ulcers. International Wound Journal 5 (2) 267-2799. Franks P, Moffatt CJ, Murray S et al (2012) Evaluation of the performance of a new compression system in patients with lymphoedema. International Wound Journal (in press)10. Collier M, Schuren J (2007) Ease of use and reproducibility of 5 compression systems. Journal of Wound Care 2007, Supplement 8-10